- Sidewalk, 1996?: Check out the cumbersomely named Windows Live Expo beta , code named "Fremont" and you'll love a glimpse of Microsoft oh-so-last-century humor. Middle of the page: "Completely Random Listings!." That's got to be engineering humor from some geeks who have tried to find a place (sometimes buried ten clicks in) for everything.
- Visit Fremont before Microsoft redesigns it. Here's the vibrant Seattle neighborhood
to which Microsoft has given its Google Base beater the aspirational code name. Fremonts in Seattle, Portland, the Bay Area and beyond : Which Fremont can the new Microsoft take you to? - Fox gets it right. The network's 7-year deal with the affiliates is just the kind of thing print publishers need to do. No, publishers don't have affiliates in the same way broadcasters do. But they do need to find and exploit many forms of distribution asap, and remove the roadblocks to using them. For broadcasters, their affiliates -- understandably feeling some ownership in the promotion of shows now being offered up on VOD-- could have been a stopping point. Sharing a bit of the 99 cent-downloads with them lets Fox go about its business. For publishers, it's learning to use every distribution channel possible, finding micro-pricing models that work, and being willing to share a few pennies here and there. As Josh Bernoff, a Forrester analyst, said: "This is a way to get the affiliates to stop whining. " To which Jay Smith, head of Cox Communications and outgoing chair of the Newspaper Association of America, would have added, as he said at Chicago convention: "Stop whining. Start winning."
- Channel surfing: The New York Times is one of those trying out some new channels. Its TimesSelect product has won many subscribers and provided a vital new revenue stream -- impact on ad pages unknown. Now it is offering and promoting big-time in the paper: www.nytimes.com/university It's not a new idea: half-price for the students and faculty, this time for the online Times Select product and, importantly, its impressive newspaper-of-record archive. What will the product, if successful, do to the Times' own substantial revenue from academic distribution, licensed largely through libraries, and how else might it disrupt the academic licensing market? As is too common with the Times, its own interface and buying process is too hard. If you want to buy a gift sub for a student, and you're already a Times or TimesSelect subscriber, it won't let you -- reminding you "According to our records you already have access to TimesSelect." Thanks.

It's good to see a TV network like Fox keeping its affiliate network intact for seven years. But sharing revenues from downloads (and apparently, advertising) doesn't go far enough. Fox ought to start marshalling its vast resources to buy Websites that can support local advertising for its affiliate network (directory advertising, coupons, ecommerce etc.)Since the deal was announced, Fox has invested a few million in SimplyHired, a recruitment site. Maybe that's a start....
Posted by: Peter Krasilovsky | April 24, 2006 at 10:49 AM