The 2Q earnings numbers reported today by Dow Jones are certainly no surprise to News Corp. It has conducted much due diligence about the state of the DJ business. Besides all the same trend lines affecting Dow Jones consumer business afflict News Corp's own newspaper business. Flat is the new growth, and publishers desperately hope to see flat again soon, as they struggle to find words to express their exasperation. DJ CEO Rich Zannino today: "choppy and challenging."
So what do we make of the report?
Yes, the net is down 26% for the quarter, but a closer look at the numbers reveals several points:
---The most familiar is the universal one, hurting Dow Jones as it hurts all companies whose main income is print. As Dow Jones transitions as furiously as it can to the digital future, the print ad decline (6.8% for the print Journal) is now swamping digital advances.
---Most worrisome is that the areas like technology and financial advertising in print, which had been maintaining, are now seeing decline. This development shows the maturation of the interactive ad industry as it more confidently moves dollars from print to more efficient, more measurable online ads. While the Journal is capturing some of this business, it's just not capturing enough, at a high enough price point, to offset the print declines. The Journal is seeing good increases from such areas as video, where it recently raised rates to $90 cpms, but again it hasn't found ways to generate enough revenue off from enough customers to offset print declines. This is emblematic of the industry as a whole.
---All the growth is in the Enterprise division growth. Given that News Corps's announced play in the acquisition is Consumer -- Fox Business News Channel+ -- this raises further question as to whether News Corp would grasp the B2B play and become a player in an area in which it now doesn't much play or whether it would sell the fastest-growth, highest-margin part of the business and concentrate on B2C. Dow Jones bought the half of Factiva it didn't own from Reuters in October of last year for $170 million. Might a whole, now-more-slimmed-down and efficient Factiva fetch closer to $400 million to today's market? Rupert's premium for the acquisition is about $1.5 billion. A sale of Factiva could quickly recoup a third of that -- but remove the growth part of the business from the portfolio.
---With the report and hard times to come, is Rupert's premium really 65% or is it more? Would DJ stock have further fallen, like its peers, if not for bid? What are News Corp shareholders to think of the real value of the asset they've almost bought?
.

Comments