Talk about rocks and hurtful places. Dow Jones journalists are left wondering this week whether they are better off with Rupert Murdoch's deep, but suspicious, pockets. Or if Dow Jones stays away out of News Corp's clutches, will they see accelerating job cuts?
They are not alone. If you work at the Chicago Tribune, L.A. Times or Orlando Sentinel, you're wondering the same thing about the Sam Zell buyout. If the Zell buyout goes through, are they more (or less) likely to hold on to their jobs?
There are no clear answers to that, other than the obvious: poor ad revenues will mean decline, no matter who the owners are. But in the Tribune's case, the debt it is planning to take on might lead to greater cost-cutting than the average challenged newspaper company.
Bloomberg's Tim Mullaney has put together a good report on that. He parses Tribune's historical projections and its current reality. Lots of good numbers in there, but this one stands out: the company had projected cash flows this year being reduced 2.9%. Current projections are more like 22%.
Bad and worsening cash flow. New mountains of debt. Those two things don't add up. And that's probably the main reason why the market doesn't believe the sale is going to happen, pricing the stock at $28 and change, when the buyout offer is slated to be $34.
It’s a long time now between midsummer and the fourth quarter, in which FCC approval of the Tribune's cross-ownership of TV and newspapers, post-sale is expected. With the Tribune underperforming an underperforming industry -- even L.A. Times Publisher and Tribune insider David Hiller acknowledges that publicly -- the problems will only grow.
There are lots of chewy issues here, and related to Dow Jones. What if, many ask, the Bancrofts say no to Murdoch? What if the Tribune/Zell deal falls apart, on debt servicing anxieties? All part of the same issue: how's the industry, how's the journalism, how's the reporting gonna weather the storm?

Comments